• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Freedom

Status
Not open for further replies.
K

Ken Stallings

Guest
I wish to make a point here.

I'm not at all concerned that the day after Easter the staff elected to close the Easter thread I created. That is understandable and fine.

What I want to address is the public discontent a few members went out of their way to put on public display. If a Muslim SOH member wished to post a purely celebratory thread regarding Ramadan, or a Jewish SOH member wished to post a purely celebratory thread on Passover, then I would take one of two responses.

I would either choose to respectfully abstain from participation, or I would choose to post a reply showing total respect for their core cultural and religious beliefs, and do so out of genuine respect for the aspects of their humanity that give them focus and balance. Personally, I would choose the second course because I would want to embrace the member's values as a pure act of friendship.

I am sure there are many agnostic and athiestic SOH members, and nearly all of them chose to respectfully follow one of the two courses of action I advocated myself above.

Why then a few chose to do otherwise simply is something that cannot be ignored. Why would SOH members go out of their way to be needlessly disrespectful is simply beyond me. Frankly, my parents did not raise me to be that way. Yes, we can debate objective issues. But, religious holidays are not up for debate, especially one that billions of humans consider important to them worldwide! Nor should the recognition be relegated to a quiet, dark, private closet at home!

In other words, we here at SOH should welcome members who positively share the important issues of their lives. Whether that includes births in the family, marriage, employment actions, or religious holidays of vital importance in their lives -- those should be celebrated by the membership at large. And frankly, if they cannot be, then what's the point of Newshawks in SOH?

At the same time, posting threads about family illnesses, tragedies, or other sad news is likewise to be respected. We should be in a position to provide each other moral support during hard times. If someone in such an hour of need ask for prayers, are they supposed to put SOH on a "not welcome here" list? And, again, if we cannot do this, then what's the point of Newshawks in SOH?

Finally, newsworthy events in virtual and real aviation have always been a core part of this Newhawks forums, and again, if not, then what's the pont?

Ultimately, those who cannot respectfully celebrate the variations in culture and values among humanity, and genunely rejoice that in our world such freedoms are cherished and celebrated, are frankly ill suited to make any arguments that they should enjoy such respect for their own personal beliefs and freedoms!

That Easter thread was in no way a debate point. Frankly, I seriously doubt anyone needed a history lesson on the origins of the holiday. There are only 365 days on the calendar (plus leap year day). It is virtually impossible to pick any day that enjoys an entirely unique role in history or celebration. After millenia of human history, the odds just don't add up.

And please, to turn such a thread into a referendum on what every staff member chooses as a personal belief system was really shocking to me! That reaction I never anticipated. I mean for next Christmas do the members need to poll in with parental status before posting about opening gifts on Christmas morning!

I guess what I'm really saying is there should be room and respect more than enough to allow pious people to celebrate their holidays without having to worry about stepping on someone's toes! And frankly, if there are members out there who's toes stick out that far, then I would frankly suggest they curl them in a bit to avoid the pain!

Sincerely expressed,

Ken Stallings
 
What I want to address is the public discontent a few members went out of their way to put on public display. If a Muslim SOH member wished to post a purely celebratory thread regarding Ramadan, or a Jewish SOH member wished to post a purely celebratory thread on Passover, then I would take one of two responses.

I would either choose to respectfully abstain from participation, or I would choose to post a reply showing total respect for their core cultural and religious beliefs, and do so out of genuine respect for the aspects of their humanity that give them focus and balance. Personally, I would choose the second course because I would want to embrace the member's values as a pure act of friendship.


Ken, I know you're only trying to lay a few things to bed and be heard, but it's a good policy to consider a conversation closed, over and done when a thread is locked even if wounds are fresh. Don't get me wrong, I understand this post of yours has nothing but the best intent, but it's a good policy because threads in an attempt to be heard after the fact are bound to be locked as well and only fan the fire. Further, dropping it after a thread is locked assists in the moderation of these forums even if you were the source of the heat (I know a thing or two about that).
 
I seem to recall that the original guidelines for the Newshawks forum be that any discussion slightly or greater than removed from flight sims could go, as long as it was not about religion or politics.

I seem to remember you and I having a few good roustabouts regarding politics and religion Ken. Among a host of others, that's pretty much what set the guidelines for the (then) new forum we're in now.

Seems all that passionate stuff was relegated to a forum titled, "Oso's Outhouse."

Now it's still there, down at the bottom of the roster. They call it the "Quarter Moon Cafe" I believe.

It's a good place to go raise a little encitement without an official sanction from the website owners. It is in fact, their private domain, not a public place. No freedom of speech violated. Only an end-user agreement to abide by.

Are you an abiding user, Ken?
 
Ken, it's simple, really. You're a guest in somebody else's house. And the host has kindly asked that you not start religious or political threads here in this particular forum, because the host has found that, sooner or later, such posts degrade into contentious debate, which the host wishes to avoid if possible. You may disagree with your host on this, but it's his house and you should respect his wishes on this. See? Simple. That's all there is to it. You may even be correct that everyone with differing religious views than yours ought to cut off their toes to accommodate you, but that isn't the point. The point is you have been asked to comply with a few simple rules.
 
Ken, it's simple, really. You're a guest in somebody else's house. And the host has kindly asked that you not start religious or political threads here in this particular forum, because the host has found that, sooner or later, such posts degrade into contentious debate, which the host wishes to avoid if possible. You may disagree with your host on this, but it's his house and you should respect his wishes on this. See? Simple. That's all there is to it. You may even be correct that everyone with differing religious views than yours ought to cut off their toes to accommodate you, but that isn't the point. The point is you have been asked to comply with a few simple rules.


Actually, the metaphor I used was to "curl" in one's toes to avoid them being injured.

Hardly your summation.

Cheers,

Ken
 
I agree Ken,
I am personally not religious in any way, if i were to pick one for me, maybe closest to buddhist(my wife is so her ideas and beliefs often rub off on me.), but thats not important. Respecting other ideologies is. The world is a big place filled with lots of different ideas and interpretations of what life is and what it means. We are all stuck on this planet together. We can either respect each others beliefs and try to get along or we can bicker and kill each other over who's savior is right.

While I am not 'christian' that certianly doesnt stop me from buying Bill's great addon's. I respect him as a fellow airplane and scifi geek. I have absolutely no objection to him adding spiritual messages to his manuals. I really respect that he stands by his beliefs and he doesnt make anyone feel threatened who doesn't follow his beliefs. There is a difference between saying 'This is what i believe and it is what makes me want to wake up every morning' compared to 'This is what I believe and you are gonna go to hell if you dont'

Anyway whatever floats your boat in life. The best advice I ever heard was find somthing in life that makes you happy and go with it.

This is one of my favorite bumperstickers....heh it worked on star trek LOL
View attachment 4057
Cheers
TJ
 
I agree Ken,
I am personally not religious in anyway, if i were to pick one for me, maybe closest to buddhist(my wife is so her ideas and beliefs often rub off on me.), but thats not important. Respecting other ideologies is. The world is a big place filled with lots of different ideas and interpretations of what life is and what it means. We are all stuck on this planet together. We can either respect each others beliefs and try to get along or we can bicker and kill each other over who's savior is right.

While I am not 'christian' that certianly doesnt stop me from buying Bill's great addon's. I respect him as a fellow airplane and scifi geek. I have absolutely no objection to him adding spiritual messages to his manuals. I really respect that he stands by his beliefs and he doesnt make anyone feel threatened who doesn't follow his beliefs. There is a difference between saying 'This is what i believe and it is what makes me want to wake up every morning' compared to 'This is what I believe and you are gonna go to hell if you dont'

Anyway whatever floats your boat in life. The best advice I ever heard was find somthing in life that makes you happy and go with it.

This is one of my favorite bumperstickers....heh it worked on star trek LOL
View attachment 4057
Cheers
TJ

Thank you, sir! At least one other member here understands the point I am making. :engel016:

Cheers,

Ken
 
I seem to recall that the original guidelines for the Newshawks forum be that any discussion slightly or greater than removed from flight sims could go, as long as it was not about religion or politics.


Seems all that passionate stuff was relegated to a forum titled, "Oso's Outhouse."

Now it's still there, down at the bottom of the roster. They call it the "Quarter Moon Cafe" I believe.

It's a good place to go raise a little encitement without an official sanction from the website owners. It is in fact, their private domain, not a public place. No freedom of speech violated. Only an end-user agreement to abide by.

Thanks magoo, you said it better than I ever could have :ernae:
 
Hey All,

I'm just looking forward to the irony of a thread called freedom being closed.

I'll not say further as over the years I've not seen the standards this part of SOH is supposed to be about truly consistently applied. There is bias but in most things human there always is. That coupled with no appeal is what I think frustrates many.

-Ed-
 
Well Ken, Im glad you posted the Easter thread.

I believe you didnt mean any harm, and most of the posts in it were in agreement. Very few rocks were thrown.

:salute:



Bill
 
seems to me the rules and format
needs to be changed freedom of speech about politics and religion
need to be tighter
this is not the place
watch out for new rules
H
 
Maybe the concept everyone seems to be searching for in this thread is called, "Respect".

Respect is earned, not given
Think first before posting.
"Will this be harmful?" "Do I really need to say it?" "Does it really belong in this forum?"
Many times I've written a novella as a response, only to cancel it.

Sometimes things are better left unsaid.
You don't always need to "Win".
Remember, it's always a two way street, the other side is just as hurt or confused as you are.
You don't always have to correct someone over something very minor.

Treat people the way you want to be treated.
Mocking someone is a form of hatred.
Belittling someone or their beliefs only serves one purpose. To make you look like more of an :censored: to everyone else.

And for God's sake, even if you don't agree with someone's lifestyle, respect them.
There are some folks here I don't agree with their lifestyles.
But I respect them as fellow human beings and freely give them the dignity they deserve.
Many I can call friends.
 
Maybe the concept everyone seems to be searching for in this thread is called, "Respect".

Well said, but what happens if a person or group of people refuses to realize they're being disrespectful? Respect and a lack thereof is based on perception. The most common internet arguments in the world are "you're being a jerk!!" "no you're being a jerk!!". That's why there is no freedom of speech on all of these private forums, and that's why religion and politics are banned.

This is the only flight sim forum that I'm aware of that even hassles itself to provide us with a special place for religion and politics.
 
Ken, it's simple, really. You're a guest in somebody else's house. And the host has kindly asked that you not start religious or political threads here in this particular forum, because the host has found that, sooner or later, such posts degrade into contentious debate, which the host wishes to avoid if possible. You may disagree with your host on this, but it's his house and you should respect his wishes on this. See? Simple. That's all there is to it. You may even be correct that everyone with differing religious views than yours ought to cut off their toes to accommodate you, but that isn't the point. The point is you have been asked to comply with a few simple rules.


And yet it happens all the time and the mods never step in and do anything until the thread has gone out of control and even then the protester is villified and the OP who started an evangelical post is left unchallenged. Now we know why as most of the mods are openly biased. Why not have a 'We Love God' subforum where all the people of faith can congregate and be missionaries to each other rather than trying to be missionaries to the great unwashed in the wider forums. I'm almost certain some people here think it is there religious duty to try and spread the word at every opportunity and I seem to be the only one who is offended enough to speak up about it. It's not good enough to just say if you don't like it then just ignore the post (which doesn't seem to work both ways). If I find it offensive and insulting and I do then I should be able to stick my hand up and object in whatever terms necessary.

seems to me the rules and format
needs to be changed freedom of speech about politics and religion
need to be tighter
this is not the place
watch out for new rules
H

From your lips to Ickie's ears Henry!

Crap, I'm going to be late for work :eek:
 
Guys, lets bury this thread.

Even burying it won't make it go away.

I believe the moderators have already seen my opinion on the whole matter. (in private, where it should be)

I look forward to the new rules, Henry. :salute:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top