As the nature of things progress...

Researching original instruments was a fascinating exercise...

attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • asi_621.jpg
    asi_621.jpg
    35.9 KB · Views: 6
  • AVRO__compass.jpg
    AVRO__compass.jpg
    35.9 KB · Views: 5
  • AVRO_altimeter.jpg
    AVRO_altimeter.jpg
    35.5 KB · Views: 5
Fun to reproduce accurate, and lively graphics too.
2 days per gauge - but at least they're going to be archived for future projects. :)

attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • AVRO_rpm.jpg
    AVRO_rpm.jpg
    35 KB · Views: 5
  • Slip_Turn.jpg
    Slip_Turn.jpg
    25 KB · Views: 6
Each day passes as if it were a minute. I'm amazed at how much work you can cram into each one, Nigel.

Soulful stuff, sir!
 
I'm gobsmacked. That's about the best work on gauge faces I've ever ran into. Very well done Nigel!
 
Looking good Nigel, now, what would be really something would be if those gauges had luminescent paint for night flying, or under the instrument hood. :)

Ttfn

Pete
 
Thanks for the good words and keeping the spirits high - very much appreciated Gentlemen :)

Pete: No looooominous gauges on the Real AVRO, but I know what you mean.

Hmmm...so you wan't an instrument training hood, do you?
Well, we're already at the poly limit for the cowled version, but I'll gladly see what's possible on the uncowled 621 trainer variants. :)

But don't fret on the looominies; Uncle Nigel has provided the correct night flying lamps (just like the Real AVRO).

attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • -2017-feb-3-002.jpg
    -2017-feb-3-002.jpg
    48 KB · Views: 6
  • -2017-feb-3-005.jpg
    -2017-feb-3-005.jpg
    45.4 KB · Views: 5
  • -2017-feb-3-006.jpg
    -2017-feb-3-006.jpg
    44.2 KB · Views: 6
Polish PWS-18?

Although I only have a handful of blurred photos, colour profiles and a very questionable 3-view, I was wondering whether there would be any interest in the Polish license-built and modified version of the Tutor.

The Wright J-5 Whirlwind powered PWS-18.

Quite a chunky, robust looking bird IMO, has a few more horses with a DECREASE in engine weight, too...

attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php


Always held the utmost respect and awe for Poland's couragious pilots. Could be interesting to see their trainer in sim. :)
 

Attachments

  • 1598601210.jpg
    1598601210.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 6
  • polskie-skrzydla-7-pws-18.jpg
    polskie-skrzydla-7-pws-18.jpg
    20.3 KB · Views: 9
  • PWS-18.jpg
    PWS-18.jpg
    44.7 KB · Views: 6
Wow Nigel, you really did an incredible job on these faces!

The research on these item is always interesting and surprising. I can recall an aircraft which was reasonably well documented. In the manual all the gauges where described with values and type numbers. However when I checked an un-restored wreck I came to the conclusion that quite some of the gauges had changed during the operational life. Its the same with pictures in manuals. These are often taken from a prototype, which is not always the same as the production version.

About the Polish version; Although there will definitely be people who will be delighted to fly one, I personally will stick to the UK versions.

Cheers,
Huub
 
Polish PWS-18 off the drawing board, out of the hangar.

As per recipe; rounded wingtips, Armstrong Siddeley Lynx replaced with license-built Wright J-5 9 cylinder, removal of slats option, NEW cowl.


attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    55.5 KB · Views: 7
  • -2017-feb-12-031.jpg
    -2017-feb-12-031.jpg
    45.1 KB · Views: 5
  • -2017-feb-12-028.jpg
    -2017-feb-12-028.jpg
    57.1 KB · Views: 5
Off to the paint shop, on to remaining AVRO variants...

Exhaust outlet setup initially had me stumped - ALL the drawings and colour profiles were WAYYYYY off the mark.
So I went back to REALLY scrutinizing those blurry old photos...

attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php


All was happily was revealed when I finally began to SEE.


Off back to my shed...:wavey:
 

Attachments

  • -2017-feb-12-002.jpg
    -2017-feb-12-002.jpg
    55.4 KB · Views: 13
  • -2017-feb-12-032.jpg
    -2017-feb-12-032.jpg
    83.5 KB · Views: 12
  • -2017-feb-12-030.jpg
    -2017-feb-12-030.jpg
    44.9 KB · Views: 11
Exhaust outlet setup initially had me stumped - ALL the drawings and colour profiles were WAYYYYY off the mark.
So I went back to REALLY scrutinizing those blurry old photos...
All was happily was revealed when I finally began to SEE.


Off back to my shed...:wavey:

Looking great Nigel and I'm looking forward to your Avro.

I know what you mean about drawings and profiles being off. And I just learned to not count on the accuracy of museum photos. I went back to those about some detail on the canopy I'm sorting out and something suddenly struck me as very odd. In the museum, the canopy sides are inset about 6 inches or so into the fuselage. But every photo I've found taken during it's operational days, it's not. I'm thinking that when it was put back together for the museum after it's '39 crash and ended up upside down in the river, the canopy was probably busted all to pieces. And whoever rebuilt it for the museum had no clue on what an aircraft canopy was supposed to look like. At least I've got a general idea of what it's supposed to look like and how the sections slide back and forth.

The 3 views are almost done now. The prop is pretty much the only thing left fo do.
 
Looking great Nigel and I'm looking forward to your Avro.

I know what you mean about drawings and profiles being off. And I just learned to not count on the accuracy of museum photos. I went back to those about some detail on the canopy I'm sorting out and something suddenly struck me as very odd. In the museum, the canopy sides are inset about 6 inches or so into the fuselage. But every photo I've found taken during it's operational days, it's not. I'm thinking that when it was put back together for the museum after it's '39 crash and ended up upside down in the river, the canopy was probably busted all to pieces. And whoever rebuilt it for the museum had no clue on what an aircraft canopy was supposed to look like. At least I've got a general idea of what it's supposed to look like and how the sections slide back and forth.

The 3 views are almost done now. The prop is pretty much the only thing left fo do.

Thank you, Willy.

With the exception of famed draughtsmen known for their accuracy, I prefer never to put my faith in 3-views other than as a starting point.
Going with gut feeling and keen observation will usually glean a better insight into the subject and its workings.
I've always enormously enjoyed doing research and preparing technical drawings - this is just an extension of the same challenging process.

Familiarity with your subject is fundamental.

There's also the rudiments of a NEW conspiracy theory somewhere in there as well; WHO the heck has grabbed all the blasted engineering drawings! :)
 
Aboslutely superb attention to detail! And the paint job ... I could wax lyrical about those reflection...
 
Back
Top