HoggyDog
Members +
was just wondering if anyone would like to make a pack with the download able skins in a Mega Pack for the airplane? i would Volunteer to put it togeather and Make sure all the textures have the credits of who painted them attached so people could download one File with the repaints in them No editing needed just drop and drag ready to fly
I'm not sure what you meant by "How is the VC for the DC3 going, looking forward to flying with it" because this aircraft is definitely not a DC-3- it's two variants of a C-47a. Assuming, however, that your post is not in the wrong thread and your reference to "DC3" was just a generalization, I would volunteer to help with your proposed repaint packaging project by assuring that the various aircraft.cfg [fltsim.xx] entries for each skin are accurate, correct and appropriate to the particular paint. It's time for some aircraft.cfg reform!
Common errors and omissions that I see in almost EVERY aircraft.cfg snippet packaged with repaints:
- Confusion between title= and description=; title should be brief and hierarchical, i.e. start with actual aircraft type as opposed to the FS model name, then 1 or 2-word variation- just enough to differentiate between this variation/paint/livery and all others, but no more than that. For this airplane, a good title entry would be "C-47 Skytrain USAF 51-31908" or "C-47 Skytrain Ethiopian Air Lines" but not "Manfred Jahn C-47R V2 Ethiopian Air Lines ET-ATT circa 1958" etc. The description is where every detail of the airplane or FS package and/or repaint can be elaborated if desired, but not the title. Also, for airliners, the registration/tail number are not generally used except to populate the panel placard- so the title for an airliner should not be encumbered with the tail number. "C-47 Ethiopian Air Lines" is plenty- no need for "C-47 Ethiopian Air Lines ET-ATT" unless you have more than one EAL paint. On the other hand, there may be several USAF variants of this airplane, so title needs to be more than just "C-47 USAF."
- Incorrect atc_type= entries; this is generally the aircraft manufacturer. For this airplane, it is "Douglas." ATC will not speak this for airliners or air force- only for civilians with no entry in atc_airline=.
- Incorrect atc_model= entries; this is the specific aircraft model that the ATC system recognizes for this type of aircraft and is what ATC will call you as traffic to others. Should be "DC3" for this airplane, not "C-47" because ATC calls both DC-3s and C-47s the same thing when called as traffic: "DC-3."
- Misplaced atc_model= and atc_type= entries; this info is common to all variants and should be in [General] instead of duplicated in each and every repaint entry's [fltsim.xx] section
- Incorrect atc_id= entries. this should be the tail number or registration of the airplane, not a tactical call sign or flight number. Again, this is not used for airliners or military, only civilians with no entry in atc_airline=.
- Confusion between atc_type= and ui_type=; atc_type= is generally the manufacturer ("Douglas") but ui_type is the aircraft type category in the Select Aircraft dialog- this airplane would be "C-47" or "C-47 Skytrain". Admittedly, Microsoft used confusing terminology here, so it's very easy to lose your way between atc_type and ui_type.
- Omitted or incorrect atc_airline=; this is your airline or military branch call sign, not necessarily their name. For example, for British Airways paints, atc_airline= should say "Speed Bird," not "BAW" or "British Airways" and if you want your USAF airplane correctly called by ATC you must set atc_airline=AIR FORCE.
- Omitted or incorrect atc_flight_number=. For any airplane with a non-blank atc_airline= entry, this should be set to the airliner's flight number OR the military tail number or a portion of it. ATC will then refer to your airplane as "[atc_airline] [atc_flight_number]" using whatever values are in those two variables, provided of course that the atc_airline entry matches an entry in airlines.cfg and there is a matching voice file.
- Omitted or incorrect atc_parking_types=; for airliners it should be "GATE" or "GATE, RAMP"; for civilian cargo variants it should be "RAMP, CARGO" and for military cargo variants it should be "MIL_CARGO, CARGO, RAMP". The only acceptable values are RAMP, CARGO, GATE, DOCK, MIL_CARGO, MIL_COMBAT. All others are ignored.
- Missing or incorrect atc_parking_code= entries. This is used by ground control at major airports to send airliners to that airline's gates. When used, it must be set to the airline's ICAO code. Example for British Airways: atc_parking_code=BAW.
- Incorrect ui_manufacturer=; for this airplane it is "Douglas," not "Microsoft" or "Manfred Jahn"
- Incorrect ui_type=; for this airplane it is "C-47" or "C-47 Skytrain," not "DC-3" or "C-47R V2" or "Dakota."
- Incorrect ui_createdby=; another aircraft selection filter ("Publisher") describing who made the model for FS. For this airplane it should be "Manfred Jahn," not the name of the repainter.
- Incorrect ui_typerole=; these entries are used to filter the aircraft selection screen and must be broad and consistent. Valid for this airplane might be "Twin Engine Prop" or "Commercial Airliner" or "Military Cargo" etc. The more different ui_typerole= entries you create, the more confusing/redundant sub-categories you will get for Aircraft Selection.
Specific to this airplane, there are 2 models included- C47_1 and C47_2. The _1 model is the military variant and has the H-antennas mounted on the sides of the cockpit. The_2 model differs in that it doesn't have those antennas. Generally speaking, no civilian variant would still have the WWII-era military H-antennas; therefore, for military C-47s, model=C47_1 and for civilian C-47s (or C-47s doing a mediocre job of masquerading as American Airlines DC-3s**) model=C47_2.
I love this airplane, and I've been flying nothing else since I got it. The quality is equal to, and better than many, payware aircraft. It is a dream to fly, and with it's slow engine start and shutdown, Shockwave Lights, Tufun's amazing TW Radial sound package and exhaust flames effect it's "as real as it gets."
**I wonder if Manfred would consider making an actual DC-3 model with no astrodome and a single "airstair" passenger door for us diehard vintage airliner weenies...

Please let me know if I can help you with your paints-packaging project. I can't paint but I'm a fair hand with aircraft.cfg.
Best Regards

Doug