Thanks Mathias, everything looks good so far. Back to work on my projects. Regards, Tom
Great stuff Tom, keep em coming!
Thanks Mathias, everything looks good so far. Back to work on my projects. Regards, Tom
I am thinking of purchasing the a/c and want to know how she flies! How does it compare with a/c from Realair or A2A simulation? I am not too happy with hellcat from realflight, not to knock their product but it seems like a airfile thrown together, and want to make sure the a/c is not just a beautiful model without a great air file! So far only the Spitfire and the A2A simulation airplanes fly satisfactory to me compared to real world.
I am thinking of purchasing the a/c and want to know how she flies! How does it compare with a/c from Realair or A2A simulation? I am not too happy with hellcat from realflight, not to knock their product but it seems like a airfile thrown together, and want to make sure the a/c is not just a beautiful model without a great air file! So far only the Spitfire and the A2A simulation airplanes fly satisfactory to me compared to real world.
I was wondering the exact same thing.
Hopefully during the day tomorrow others will have the chance to chime in with their opinion on the flight model. Please be completely honest about it though. Flight models are the most important part of the aircraft, yet it seems that they are the weakest point of the majority of addons.
I am thinking of purchasing the a/c and want to know how she flies! How does it compare with a/c from Realair or A2A simulation? I am not too happy with hellcat from realflight, not to knock their product but it seems like a airfile thrown together, and want to make sure the a/c is not just a beautiful model without a great air file! So far only the Spitfire and the A2A simulation airplanes fly satisfactory to me compared to real world.
I like the hellcat on the way she handles on feel but the power settings and cruise charts show she is way off and cannot be flown by the book. I am wondering on the FW190 how close is it to reliable books and whats the normal cruise speed you guys get. The A2A aircraft are right on the money and are great is the FW190 the same or does she climb redicuously fast at 6000 fpm and cruise at 400 knots! Thats my question really, just like the new Iris f-14 she is beautiful but she can supercruise without afterburner which is totally incorrect but cant get to 2.00 mach. I know FSX is terrible and not a real simulator but just curious. I even been in real sims where they are off when higher in altitude but are fairly close to a/c.
I am thinking of purchasing the a/c and want to know how she flies! How does it compare with a/c from Realair or A2A simulation? I am not too happy with hellcat from realflight, not to knock their product but it seems like a airfile thrown together, and want to make sure the a/c is not just a beautiful model without a great air file! So far only the Spitfire and the A2A simulation airplanes fly satisfactory to me compared to real world.
I feel the same, about RealAir and A2A flight models being the best, and I don't even fly the Hellcat as the flight modeling on there is not to my taste at all. Like you said it feels like it was thrown together or done by somebody without any experience. However the flight model on the 190 is very nice, and in flight it is one of the most enjoyable I have experienced. It just feels real for that plane, like real flight.
As to the numbers I have not compared with anything, but off the top of my head I can tell you at 1.0 ata and 1500rpm it cruises at around 350-400kph at sea level with a light fuel load. The one thing I find odd is the rpm seems to have little affect on the performance, but without some numbers to compare to it's hard to say anything factual.
I would expect going from 1200 to 2500rpm would produce a large surge in power, and while I am not familiar with the torque curve, even a flat one would produce more than double the power at that rpm, though it hardly does anything for performance. So I get essentially the same speed regardless of RPM, with maybe a 50kph difference between the lowest and highest achievable rpm a 1.0 ata, though that's from observation and not any type of scientific testing.
1200? wow i dont think ive gone below 2500 yet. How sad is it that after being faithful to FS since FS5 i still really dont understand an adjustable prop.
That is because it's a automatic pitch/constant speed prop.
You have either this or that in FSX.
Watch the prop pitch on the corresponding gauge at the lower right panel doing it's work and best leave both pitch and rpm alone from user input, the plane will take care of it for you.
You shouldn't play with the rpm or pitch at all in an Fw190.
All you need to do with it is to fly and watch your fuel. :d