Classics Hangar Fw190 released!

Here's a high resolution shot if anybody wants to see it in more detail before buying. This is my favorite livery. Looks much nicer to me without any yellow.

fw190_12_large.jpg
 
Having fun in the 190. Thanks for the new desert paint Tom. Here's a shot along with a couple others over the last couple of days. :woot:
 
I am thinking of purchasing the a/c and want to know how she flies! How does it compare with a/c from Realair or A2A simulation? I am not too happy with hellcat from realflight, not to knock their product but it seems like a airfile thrown together, and want to make sure the a/c is not just a beautiful model without a great air file! So far only the Spitfire and the A2A simulation airplanes fly satisfactory to me compared to real world.
 
I am thinking of purchasing the a/c and want to know how she flies! How does it compare with a/c from Realair or A2A simulation? I am not too happy with hellcat from realflight, not to knock their product but it seems like a airfile thrown together, and want to make sure the a/c is not just a beautiful model without a great air file! So far only the Spitfire and the A2A simulation airplanes fly satisfactory to me compared to real world.

Hi -Good question. the FW190 flys and feels right - just like the Realair and comparable to the A2A Jug and definately has the edge over the hellcat.

Im sure others will back me up on this one!!
 
I am thinking of purchasing the a/c and want to know how she flies! How does it compare with a/c from Realair or A2A simulation? I am not too happy with hellcat from realflight, not to knock their product but it seems like a airfile thrown together, and want to make sure the a/c is not just a beautiful model without a great air file! So far only the Spitfire and the A2A simulation airplanes fly satisfactory to me compared to real world.

I was wondering the exact same thing.

Hopefully during the day tomorrow others will have the chance to chime in with their opinion on the flight model. Please be completely honest about it though. Flight models are the most important part of the aircraft, yet it seems that they are the weakest point of the majority of addons.
 
I was wondering the exact same thing.

Hopefully during the day tomorrow others will have the chance to chime in with their opinion on the flight model. Please be completely honest about it though. Flight models are the most important part of the aircraft, yet it seems that they are the weakest point of the majority of addons.


Agreed - the clue is that there are few complaints made about the FD here!!
 
Another one you can compare to how the Fw190 acts.
The technique will work with most warbirds to keep you in control during takeoff. Notice he slowly advances the throttle to 40" and waits until hitting 50mph before increasing it to 60".

Also on the pullup you can just see a slight touch of P-Factor yawing the nose.

Also note the reduction in power for climb.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubWyTc7uHpQ&feature=related
 
I am thinking of purchasing the a/c and want to know how she flies! How does it compare with a/c from Realair or A2A simulation? I am not too happy with hellcat from realflight, not to knock their product but it seems like a airfile thrown together, and want to make sure the a/c is not just a beautiful model without a great air file! So far only the Spitfire and the A2A simulation airplanes fly satisfactory to me compared to real world.

If you've read much about FW190s you'll already have an appreciation of how she should fly - fast, sensitive bordering on twitchy, responsive (especially in roll) and raring to go and kill something, including you if you take liberties. That's exactly how she does fly, quite exilharating. As for the Hellcat, she's right at the other end of the spectrum - big, heavy, rugged and stable, just the ticket for a precise approach to a tiny heaving deck. I wouldn't fancy my chances trying that in the FW190.
 
I like the hellcat on the way she handles on feel but the power settings and cruise charts show she is way off and cannot be flown by the book. I am wondering on the FW190 how close is it to reliable books and whats the normal cruise speed you guys get. The A2A aircraft are right on the money and are great is the FW190 the same or does she climb redicuously fast at 6000 fpm and cruise at 400 knots! Thats my question really, just like the new Iris f-14 she is beautiful but she can supercruise without afterburner which is totally incorrect but cant get to 2.00 mach. I know FSX is terrible and not a real simulator but just curious. I even been in real sims where they are off when higher in altitude but are fairly close to a/c.
 
I like the hellcat on the way she handles on feel but the power settings and cruise charts show she is way off and cannot be flown by the book. I am wondering on the FW190 how close is it to reliable books and whats the normal cruise speed you guys get. The A2A aircraft are right on the money and are great is the FW190 the same or does she climb redicuously fast at 6000 fpm and cruise at 400 knots! Thats my question really, just like the new Iris f-14 she is beautiful but she can supercruise without afterburner which is totally incorrect but cant get to 2.00 mach. I know FSX is terrible and not a real simulator but just curious. I even been in real sims where they are off when higher in altitude but are fairly close to a/c.

Spilot, I think you'll find the Fw190's flight dynamics are spot on. AvHistory are renowned for their flight models and the Fw190 flies as it should while exhibiting its own characteristics. Although I haven't done it yet, I've read in other posts that you'll even "blow" the engine if you just firewall it and don't pay attention to the published limits of the engine (which is different for each variant).
 
I am thinking of purchasing the a/c and want to know how she flies! How does it compare with a/c from Realair or A2A simulation? I am not too happy with hellcat from realflight, not to knock their product but it seems like a airfile thrown together, and want to make sure the a/c is not just a beautiful model without a great air file! So far only the Spitfire and the A2A simulation airplanes fly satisfactory to me compared to real world.

I feel the same, about RealAir and A2A flight models being the best, and I don't even fly the Hellcat as the flight modeling on there is not to my taste at all. Like you said it feels like it was thrown together. However the flight model on the 190 is very nice, and in flight it is one of the most enjoyable I have experienced. It just feels real for that plane, like real flight.

As to the numbers I have not compared with anything, but off the top of my head I can tell you at 1.0 ata and 1500rpm it cruises at around 350-400kph at sea level with a light fuel load. The one thing I find odd is the rpm seems to have little affect on the performance, but without some numbers to compare to it's hard to say anything factual.

I would expect going from 1200 to 2500rpm would produce a large surge in power, and while I am not familiar with the torque curve, even a flat one would produce more than double the power at that rpm, though it hardly does anything for performance. So I get essentially the same speed regardless of RPM, with maybe a 50kph difference between the lowest and highest achievable rpm a 1.0 ata, though that's from observation and not any type of scientific testing.
 
I feel the same, about RealAir and A2A flight models being the best, and I don't even fly the Hellcat as the flight modeling on there is not to my taste at all. Like you said it feels like it was thrown together or done by somebody without any experience. However the flight model on the 190 is very nice, and in flight it is one of the most enjoyable I have experienced. It just feels real for that plane, like real flight.

As to the numbers I have not compared with anything, but off the top of my head I can tell you at 1.0 ata and 1500rpm it cruises at around 350-400kph at sea level with a light fuel load. The one thing I find odd is the rpm seems to have little affect on the performance, but without some numbers to compare to it's hard to say anything factual.

I would expect going from 1200 to 2500rpm would produce a large surge in power, and while I am not familiar with the torque curve, even a flat one would produce more than double the power at that rpm, though it hardly does anything for performance. So I get essentially the same speed regardless of RPM, with maybe a 50kph difference between the lowest and highest achievable rpm a 1.0 ata, though that's from observation and not any type of scientific testing.

That is because it's a automatic pitch/constant speed prop.
You have either this or that in FSX.
Watch the prop pitch on the corresponding gauge at the lower right panel doing it's work and best leave both pitch and rpm alone from user input, the plane will take care of it for you.
 
For peoples interest in our flight model, it was created by none other than Jerry Beckwith himself:173go1:
 
1200? wow i dont think ive gone below 2500 yet. How sad is it that after being faithful to FS since FS5 i still really dont understand an adjustable prop.
 
1200? wow i dont think ive gone below 2500 yet. How sad is it that after being faithful to FS since FS5 i still really dont understand an adjustable prop.


You shouldn't play with the rpm or pitch at all in an Fw190.
All you need to do with it is to fly and watch your fuel. :d
 
That is because it's a automatic pitch/constant speed prop.
You have either this or that in FSX.
Watch the prop pitch on the corresponding gauge at the lower right panel doing it's work and best leave both pitch and rpm alone from user input, the plane will take care of it for you.

I must have missed that in the manual. lol Thanks for the correction.
 
It really is the little things that count, every time i fly this gem i find something new

Would this be oil coming out of the exhaust?
oil.jpg

oil2.jpg
 
Back
Top