aleatorylamp
Charter Member
Hello Ivan.,
I´ve read the 5 scans you sent about the Ju-52/3m´s history. Very interesting indeed!
There is data that confirms some details as regards motorizations for certain model
designations that I was still not sure of, and one or two performance indications that
clarify some contradictions. Thanks a lot!
Also, there was one totally new aspect, which would still need further confirmation:
It seems that there was an order of 6 units for South African Airways, that were
supposed to have the toe-out eliminated to increase efficiency.
Apparently the modification caused no big deal and 4 were modified, and 2 were not,
and these were accepted as well with no problem.
So there was not much controversy with the issue, but Junkers maintained their general
production without modifications, although the later Ju 252 and Ju 352 designs had their
engines thrusting in line with the longitudinal axis.
Then, the text goes on to say that the Spanish CASA manufactured units had their engines
aligned paralell to the longitudinal axis, i.e. no toe-out.
What is strange, however, is that photos of the CASA units look like they do have the toe-out!
Even the famous restored German Lufthansa D-AQUI unit is in reality a CASA-built one, and
looking at photos of it, I do get the feeling that they show a noticeable toe-out on the engines.
Anyway, we shall see...
Cheers,
Aleatorylamp
I´ve read the 5 scans you sent about the Ju-52/3m´s history. Very interesting indeed!
There is data that confirms some details as regards motorizations for certain model
designations that I was still not sure of, and one or two performance indications that
clarify some contradictions. Thanks a lot!
Also, there was one totally new aspect, which would still need further confirmation:
It seems that there was an order of 6 units for South African Airways, that were
supposed to have the toe-out eliminated to increase efficiency.
Apparently the modification caused no big deal and 4 were modified, and 2 were not,
and these were accepted as well with no problem.
So there was not much controversy with the issue, but Junkers maintained their general
production without modifications, although the later Ju 252 and Ju 352 designs had their
engines thrusting in line with the longitudinal axis.
Then, the text goes on to say that the Spanish CASA manufactured units had their engines
aligned paralell to the longitudinal axis, i.e. no toe-out.
What is strange, however, is that photos of the CASA units look like they do have the toe-out!
Even the famous restored German Lufthansa D-AQUI unit is in reality a CASA-built one, and
looking at photos of it, I do get the feeling that they show a noticeable toe-out on the engines.
Anyway, we shall see...
Cheers,
Aleatorylamp