ZsoltB
Charter Member

There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
The IIIB & The IIIC had the ATAR9B, right?
The IIIE the 09C and on request the 9K-50, but the IIIR? I readed that some of the Swiss IIIS & IIIRS, had the SEPR944 for take off and a 9K-50...:screwy:
That was the first thing I noticed was the two "014" so close together. I'd remove it from the tail so you have more orange for visibility.Thank you.
There are one or two tweaks to do. But mainly it is done.
Should I stay with 014 on tail and on fuselage like on the original paint?
Looks a bit "wrong" to me when its there two times.
Sadly I don't no, why they made it this way.
Furthermore I have decided to leave the upper wing area in this metal paint.
The starfighter had a wight area, but this looks not that clean.
On the undersight I have to do a compromise, couse of the flap-rod-housing.
...
Christoph