Restauravia Dassault Mirage IIIB Released

mirage3 said:
The IIIB & The IIIC had the ATAR9B, right?
The IIIE the 09C and on request the 9K-50, but the IIIR? I readed that some of the Swiss IIIS & IIIRS, had the SEPR944 for take off and a 9K-50...:screwy:
Click to expand...

I think the engine type(s) for the R was very much the same as the E, early build had the 09C and later the choice of the 9K-50 was included by Dassault. The SAAF for example got the 9K-50 in their late build IIIR2Z.
 
8lJkDHQ.jpg


HHTppat.jpg
 
Speaking of engine variations, the Commonwealth Aircraft Factory (or Corporation as they became) built up an Avon powered IIIO before sanity prevailed and the powers that be reminded them of how much time the Avon Sabre project consumed.
Apparently the one off Avon Mirage was an absolute hot rod, in retrospect, the problems that AMD caused with spare parts and their 'AMD only' tools, along with difficulties in obtaining cannon rounds, might have made the 'Made in Australia' Avon version a better long term proposal.
:triumphant:
 
Ladies and gentlemen..... 2 argentinian Mirages

wow very nice. so we have 2 argentinian MIIIB (mine and yours) :applause::applause::applause::applause:
 
Today i started repainting, and following Cristoph (F-4F) i do an "what if?" USAFE Lakenheath repaint. It will represent the scheme of an F-15C (84019).
Next days will finish and post the screenshots!
Bests

Miro
 
Hi folks,
at the moment i have serious problems with my internet. It is unbelievable how dependet we are today from these things.
Further more real life keeps me very busy these days:)
None the less i try to make some painting in my freetime. If i have the possibility, there will be another upload in the near future:))





With best regards

Christoph:running:
 
Thank you:wavey:.
There are one or two tweaks to do. But mainly it is done.
Should I stay with 014 on tail and on fuselage like on the original paint?
Looks a bit "wrong" to me when its there two times.
Sadly I don't no, why they made it this way.
Furthermore I have decided to leave the upper wing area in this metal paint.
The starfighter had a wight area, but this looks not that clean.
On the undersight I have to do a compromise, couse of the flap-rod-housing.
...

Christoph
 
F-4F said:
Thank you:wavey:.
There are one or two tweaks to do. But mainly it is done.
Should I stay with 014 on tail and on fuselage like on the original paint?
Looks a bit "wrong" to me when its there two times.
Sadly I don't no, why they made it this way.
Furthermore I have decided to leave the upper wing area in this metal paint.
The starfighter had a wight area, but this looks not that clean.
On the undersight I have to do a compromise, couse of the flap-rod-housing.
...

Christoph
Click to expand...
That was the first thing I noticed was the two "014" so close together. I'd remove it from the tail so you have more orange for visibility.
:ernaehrung004:
 
F-4F said:
On the undersight I have to do a compromise, couse of the flap-rod-housing.
...

Christoph
Click to expand...

A great 'what if' Christoph! It's possible to paint the two elevon actuating rod covers if that's what you mean; they're on MB302.

Mirage ARDU 1.jpg

DaveQ
 
Thank you very much for your feedback!

@fsafranek:
It will be done.

@DaveQ:
I have to put the NASA-logo and the letter in the right place as you can see it on the upper sight.
I do my very best. As an alternetive I will put a Nasa-logo on the undersight of the fuselage. There it can be seen, even if the fueltanks are there. Little freedom for the artist:)

Christoph
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top