It can be done as Mose03 said. If it were to be done one should plan on extensively documenting the changes that were made and why they were needed. Siting sources where you got the performance benchmarks for the new FM would be necessary.
-
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Team Outhouse 2012 RTWR Practice 2 Race Thread
- Thread starter Tako_Kichi
- Start date
warchild
Charter Member
sources would be the original files. I didnt really modify anything. I simply inserted the PAD aircraft.cfg data for weight, fuel, and engine data into the PSS aircraft.cfg file, replacing the PSS entries ( Geometry, and contact points remained the same ). I also used the entire PAD air file in place of the PSS airfile..
Ive done no reworking of the config files at all other than that. If i had, I'd need till sometime later this year before i'd be finished..
Pam
Ive done no reworking of the config files at all other than that. If i had, I'd need till sometime later this year before i'd be finished..
Pam
warchild
Charter Member
Okayyy.. I THINK i see what you folks are doing annnnd, i think i like it.. let me explain..
Since we started practice, we've mostly tried doing >700 mile hops, and tried to fly them in the fastest planes available ( ergo the reason i've been flying jets and tubeliners ), but here in canada, weve been flying shorter hops between 400 and 600 miles. a lot of us have planes that go real fast, but dont go very far. others have planes that go real far, but not very fast.. What i'm thinking is that faster planes on shorter hops, may be faster over all than using moderately fast planes over longer hops. instead of using 2 tigercats or hornets, use three bearcats or fury's.. in the end, the bearcats would take less time over all, and could cover greater distance.
What do you guys think??
Pam
Since we started practice, we've mostly tried doing >700 mile hops, and tried to fly them in the fastest planes available ( ergo the reason i've been flying jets and tubeliners ), but here in canada, weve been flying shorter hops between 400 and 600 miles. a lot of us have planes that go real fast, but dont go very far. others have planes that go real far, but not very fast.. What i'm thinking is that faster planes on shorter hops, may be faster over all than using moderately fast planes over longer hops. instead of using 2 tigercats or hornets, use three bearcats or fury's.. in the end, the bearcats would take less time over all, and could cover greater distance.
What do you guys think??
Pam
