• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

The Ongoing Mystery Aircraft Thread Part Deux.

knowing lefty's predilection for the obscure, I'd be savouring schnitzel, goulash or something cooked over a gypsy campfire...or perhaps brewed with beer and smothered in cheese... but at least it wasn't disguised by grainy film.

so far I can't find it on ObscureAirplanes.net:rolleyes:
 
Rob, you're on the right track - I think our resident Balkan Bogeyman must be losing his touch - this one is a Romanian S.E.T. XV from 1938, which I suppose suffered the same fate as all biplane fighters of that era.

Something much easier, and much uglier, a bizarre floating/flying greenhouse.
 
Rob, you're on the right track - I think our resident Balkan Bogeyman must be losing his touch - this one is a Romanian S.E.T. XV from 1938, which I suppose suffered the same fate as all biplane fighters of that era.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] Originally, both the SPAD-S.E.T., completed in 1933, and the much improved S.E.T. XV, rolled out the next year, were planned to compete for the new fighter type sought by the Romanian air force. In 1934, however, the ARR fighter competition, marked by closed-door tacit agreements and bribery scandals, had long before been decided in the favour of the gull-winged Polish P.Z.L. P.11. Indeed, the P.11 outclassed its rival Romanian and foreign competitors in many aspects, including manoeuvrability and speed.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] Undoubtedly, however, the S.E.T. XV, the last fighter born on the draft boards of S.E.T., represents the most advanced design to be built at Societatea pentru exploatari technice. In spite of its biplane configuration and fixed undercarriage, the prototype embodied several modern features, such as all-metal construction with fabric skinning, enclosed cockpit, oxygen installation for high altitude interception flights, radio set and NACA-ring around the radial engine. The powerplant, a Gnome & Rhône 9Krsd nine-cylinder radial of 500 h.p. (373 kW), offered an impressive 340 km/h maximum speed at 4,000 m and 9,400 m ceiling. The wings were arranged in a sesquiplane configuration, having different spans, a fashionable design of the early thirties. The upper wing was 9.40 m wide, while the lower was 6.70 m, offering a total of 18.65 m² wing surface. The length of the streamlined fuselage was 7.00 m, the height was 3.05 m. Empty weight was 1,150 kg while, all-up, the airplane totalized 1,550 kg. As armament, the standard two 7.7 mm Vickers machine guns were installed on the front fuselage, firing through the propeller arc. In spite of prolonged trials performed with Escadrila de experiente (Experiments Squadron), based at Pipera-Bucharest airfield, the ARR had shown no interest in the aircraft and subsequently it was abandoned.[/FONT]


Apparently there was a lot of political wheeling and dealing that killed the SET XV
I'd reached the Balkans as a likely target but couldn't find a picture to home in on the target...

Something much easier, and much uglier, a bizarre floating/flying greenhouse.

I got it!! I got it!! It's a technical exercise in centre-of-gravity-gone-wrong!
Actually this flurry of one-off stuff is killing me :wiggle:
 
'Flurry of one-off stuff' ??? I thought that's what this thread was all about !!:banghead:

Anyway, Rob, as you obviously have the over-glazed floating horror nailed, please ID it and post something from the Galahad treasure chest....... in the meantime, sup on this tankard of metheglin.......:icon29:
 
Well, I was trying to buy some more time to track this one down. I had collected this photo at some point but failed to name it correctly when I saved it. :isadizzy:

I know the country and year more or less but can't find it again! What is irritating is that I have come across this one a few times in the past but can't remember it. White flag...
 
Same here Moses, I found this pic on another forum (actually 3 different photos of it), but the individual who posted it never revealed it's ID. One of the things the person stated in his post was "this is what happens when you fly too close to the sun", which of course led me to believe the name of the contraption possibly contained "Icarus". That lead hasn't led anywhere for me - not sure if it was meant to be a hint or just a reference to it's odd configuration and appearance.
 
Well well, it seems my dispensing of the booze was somewhat premature.

The floater is the Lawrence-Lewis Type A from Chicago, c.1915

Here's a zappy wee fighter. (Sorry about the thumbnails going all grotty when reduced)
 
It's the R.E.P. C.1 Funny, of all of my last three, I thought this would be the least likely to be snapped up by the Texan maestro.......The hat-trick still eludes.....:icon29:
 
My apologies for holding up the show. Was just now able to get to the computer since earlier today.

Any takers on this cruiser?
 
While not a stinker, this one is a little off the beaten path. It's the Dayton-Wright OW.1 Aerial Coupe. Last aircraft ever designed by Orville Wright. I'm sure you have heard of him.

Next up, a floater...
 
Back
Top